Confirmed 45,921,698 +29,424 new today Deaths 1,193,909 +692 new today Recovered 33,252,218 Active: 11,475,571 Last updated: October 31, 2020 - 5:04 am (+00:00)
Home Sport Expelled USC football player scores legal victory in Title IX case, vows...

Expelled USC football player scores legal victory in Title IX case, vows to continue fighting ‘male bias’ that dashed his NFL hopes


For greater than three years, expelled College of Southern California (USC) football player Matt Boermeester – embroiled in a Title IX assault accusation case – has been fighting the state legal system only for the prospect to have his facet heard on a federal degree.

Regardless of a small and uncommon legal victory, the one-time Nationwide Football League (NFL) hopeful says he has a good distance to go in his quest for due course of in a life derailed by what he deems an unjust “male bias witch hunt.”

“The truth is important because the consequences for me have been so devastating. The truth is all I am seeking here,” Boermeester instructed Fox Information this week. “You don’t realize, you are a kid at the time, that USC is trying to protect itself and its hundreds of millions of Title IX funding, not you as the student.”

Late final month, the California Court docket of Attraction reversed the trial courtroom choice and overturned Boermeester’s January 2017 expulsion, ruling that his Title IX continuing was “unfair.”

This paves the way in which for Boermeester, now 26, to forge forward with a seven-count federal lawsuit towards the distinguished college on the grounds of “breach of contract, infliction of emotional distress, negligence and selective enforcement of Title IX,” the federal laws that outlaws gender-based discrimination in the training system and obliges establishments to pursue investigations round sexual misconduct.

Late last month, the California Court of Appeal reversed the trial court decision and overturned Boermeester’s January, 2017 expulsion, ruling that his Title IX proceeding was “unfair.” This paves the way for Boermeester, now 26, to forge ahead with a seven-count federal lawsuit against the prominent university on the grounds of “breach of contract, infliction of emotional distress, negligence and selective enforcement of Title IX,” the federal legislation that outlaws gender-based discrimination in the education system and obliges institutions to pursue investigations around sexual misconduct.

Andrew Miltenberg, an legal professional for Boermeester, mentioned it “is clear that USC used a flawed investigation method which included denying Matt the opportunity of real-time cross-examination of witnesses.”

“The next step is to push forward with the federal lawsuit, which has been filed, but we had to put it on hold while the California State Court gave us the right to move forward, which it just did. That suit will go into a discovery which will allow us to depose various witnesses and get to see what was in their (USC) records, which will help us prove this was unfounded, and expose the larger biases in the system,” he continued. “There is a long way to go; we have fought for four years just to get this far. The ruling was an important beginning, but it is not the end.”

Boermeester, then 22, was a member of the USC football crew, who kicked the game-winning discipline purpose for USC on the 2017 Rose Bowl.

However simply days after the victory, and his first night time off crutches after a post-season surgical procedure, Boermeester’s life unraveled.


In accordance to courtroom paperwork, in the early hours of Jan. 21, 2017, two USC college students heard some commotion and allegedly noticed – from a window – Boermeester put his hand on his then-girlfriend Zoe Katz’s neck and push her towards a wall close to her condominium. One of many college students reported this incident to the USC males’s tennis coach – their father – which sparked an investigation, as required by legislation.

5 days later, Boermeester was charged with “intimate partner violence” – regardless of the actual fact that the alleged sufferer said on a number of events that such conduct by no means occurred. The honors scholar was handed a letter informing him of the costs and instantly escorted off campus, ejected with simply two lessons to go earlier than commencement, out of the blue slapped with F’s for different topics, dropped from the football crew, and immediately deemed persona non grata.

“I wasn’t allowed to go to class, I wasn’t allowed to talk to my coaches or teammates, and my eligibility to play had expired. I was completely cut off from everything,” he mentioned. “The school quickly sent me a bill for the two classes I had left; they had already made up their mind that I was guilty.”

The descriptions of the incident from eyewitnesses painted an image of a tough bodily altercation, but Boermeester contended that he and his then-girlfriend had been merely “playing around” and “roughhousing” by throwing McDonald’s fries at each other.

However these few moments have confirmed to be life-altering.

On account of the expulsion, Boermeester was unable to full the two lessons wanted to obtain his diploma from USC and unable to resume his position on the USC football crew, ensuing in irreparable harm to his educational profession and derailing aspirations to play in the NFL.

“Based on nothing more than a third-party report by a non-witness–essentially a rumor that was easily and repeatedly disputed–a star athlete lost his education and his future career in the NFL,” Miltenberg continued. “That window of opportunity is very small for an athlete, and now it is gone. Professional sports is absolutely shut down for anyone with a sexual assault mark on their transcript. It doesn’t matter how good they are.”

Not solely may Boermeester not get a glance in from different NFL groups, however he was made to forgo a scholarship to one other faculty due to the F grades and the monetary maintain from the 2 remaining lessons.

“I couldn’t even get a try-out or go to a camp because of the stigma on my name,” the as soon as distinguished kicker asserted. “And I couldn’t even graduate.”

Furthermore, Katz maintained that she was by no means abused or mistreated by her accomplice, however was knowledgeable the Title IX workplace was obligated to examine and will proceed with out her consent. In Boermeester’s phrases, his then-girlfriend tried to “speak up” on his behalf however was “threatened with tampering with an investigation” and handled as one thing of a battered sufferer.

Miltenberg additionally emphasised that the case towards his shopper was “predicated on unlawful gender stereotypes and motivated by a desire to demonstrate publicly the University’s harsh stance against male perpetrators of sexual misconduct, based on nothing more than a third-party report by a non-witness.”


As a part of a courtroom submitting in the preliminary lawsuit, USC asserted that its investigation discovered Boermeester put his arms round Katz’s neck, “causing her to cough, and shoved her into a cinder block wall in the alley near her apartment at least twice” in the early hours of Jan. 21, 2017, and has staunchly maintained its place, citing surveillance video, in the case towards Boermeester.

A consultant for USC instructed Fox Information in an announcement that the varsity “disagree(s) with the appellate court’s decision and plan to appeal the case to the California Supreme Court.”

In accordance to a number of attorneys interviewed by Fox Information on the topic nationwide, increasingly instances in an analogous vein to Boermeester’s at the moment are gaining traction in the justice system at a time when the Schooling Division is making sweeping modifications to the way in which such investigations happen.

“The procedures at college campuses still stand out. Appeals like those in the recent Matt Boermeester case in California are becoming more common, as disturbingly deficient records reach appeals courts,” noticed David Katz, a former assistant U.S. Lawyer. “New rules encourage hearings by such standard, not a mere preponderance. New initiatives sent to campuses are a step in the right direction to try to get away from some colleges’ fawning acceptance and knee-jerk pursuit of accusations.”

Enacted in 1972, Title IX was initially designed to guarantee that college students have honest entry to training with out being discriminated towards on the idea of intercourse. However many years later, the Division of Schooling began to make clear the legislation’s implications for on-campus sexual harassment and in 2011 – underneath the Obama administration – additional outlined that it’s the accountability of establishments of upper training “to take immediate and effective steps to end sexual harassment and sexual violence,” and threatened mass fines and the withholding of crucial federal funding ought to colleges fail to adequately fulfill Title IX obligations.

Nevertheless, the controversy surrounding Boermeester’s case is only one of many being introduced into the general public limelight in the period of “Me Too,” contrasted with the notion of due course of stays ripe for contentious debate.

In this Feb. 27, 2020, file photo, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos pauses as she testifies during a hearing of a House Appropriations Sub-Committee on the fiscal year 2021 budget on Capitol Hill in Washington.  

Present Schooling Secretary Betsy DeVos, who cited the Boermeester case in her argument for revising federal steerage on campus sexual assault verdicts, not too long ago imposed plenty of modifications meant to restore due course of protections to college students accused of wrongdoing. One of many new mandates may also put a cease to the observe of universities launching Title IX investigations with out the permission of alleged victims. The division advocated that the modifications will “balance the scales of justice on campuses across America.”

“Aside from the increased protections for legitimate victims of sexual misconduct, there were sorely needed protections implemented for those accused to ensure all people are afforded proper access to education,” defined California-based felony protection legal professional, Troy Slaten. “Much like prosecutors around the country, universities understand that students – most of whom are already straddled with staggering debt – don’t have the ability to fight a protracted court battle to vindicate their rights. Universities have nearly limitless resources to take cases through several layers of appeal. As we see in the Boermeester case, he’s been fighting since before 2017 when he was expelled. At that rate, even a win is a loss for him and makes other students feel that they may have rights but with no remedies.”


Whereas slated to go into impact for the autumn semester, the modifications have additionally garnered important opposition and steep issues that the reforms will take campuses again to a time when rape and sexual harassment was carried out with impunity, and subsequently, democratic attorneys from 17 states and the District of Columbia have filed a lawsuit towards DeVos in a bid to halt laws handed final month limiting sexual misconduct instances falling underneath Title IX, the federal legislation prohibiting sex-based discrimination. The state of New York additionally submitted its personal grievance to the Supreme Court docket earlier this month, and Democratic Presidential hopeful Joe Biden has pledged to reverse the amendments if elected to the highest job in November.

“While I may never get those years back, I won’t stop fighting for the truth in the court of law — or for other young men who may find themselves in my circumstances,” Boermeester added.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here