Confirmed 45,360,582 +47,172 new today Deaths 1,186,609 +871 new today Recovered 33,003,694 Active: 11,170,279 Last updated: October 30, 2020 - 7:34 am (+00:00)
Home Health & Fitness Judge Andrew Napolitano: Coronavirus pandemic doesn’t give government right to bar religious...

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Coronavirus pandemic doesn’t give government right to bar religious services


Here’s a pop quiz on the Structure. What’s the first freedom protected by the Invoice of Rights? In case you guessed speech or press, then you might be shut. The primary protected freedom is faith.

The 2 faith clauses within the First Modification hold the government out of our pockets for religious functions and out of our church buildings for all functions. That was, a minimum of, the intent of the framers.

The tyrannical conduct of many state governors, who’ve issued government orders purporting to regulate personal conduct on personal property – even religious conduct in homes of worship – and within the course of have enforced these orders as in the event that they have been legal guidelines, has ignored this.


In America, governors don’t write legal guidelines; solely legislatures do. There aren’t any pandemic or public well being or emergency exceptions within the Structure.

In my house state of New Jersey, Catholics have been permitted – permitted – to attend public Lots final Sunday for the primary time in 88 days.

This has deeply troubled most of the trustworthy, and plenty of non-adherents, who perceive the ideas that solely legislatures write legal guidelines and that no legislature can write a legislation telling a religious establishment when and the way to allow worship.

So, who closed all the homes of worship? Why did Catholic bishops dispense with a virtually 1,600-year-old rule – which survived all types of wars and pestilence – requiring attendance at Sunday Mass? What grew to become of the wall of separation?

Right here is the backstory.     

Extra from Opinion

  • Judge Andrew Napolitano: America is underneath assault from three lethal viruses
  • Judge Andrew Napolitano: What if the government has it mistaken?
  • Judge Andrew Napolitano: Does the government work for us or can we work it?

When first-year legislation college students are requested the which means of the Institution Clause and the Free Train Clause within the First Modification, they typically argue that these clauses mandate a wall of separation between church and state.

Some college students even provide to discover the “wall of separation” language within the Structure. They’re nonetheless on the lookout for it.

Whereas it’s correct to use the wall of separation phrase, it’s nowhere within the Structure or in any federal statute. It was first publicly utilized in an 1802 letter from President Thomas Jefferson to a congregation of Baptists in Danbury, Conn.

The congregation had written to Jefferson complaining that Connecticut was taxing all landowners to pay for the state-supported Congregationalist Church. They advised him that the state regarded their religious freedom as a privilege to be doled out, moderately than as an inalienable right because the congregation believed it to be and as he had characterised it and different rights within the Declaration of Independence.

Jefferson understood the values underlying the faith clauses of the First Modification to imply that whereas solely Congress was prohibited from establishing a church or interfering with worship, the states shouldn’t achieve this both.

In his well-known letter, Jefferson opined that the First Modification erected “a wall of separation between church and state.” To Jefferson, the phrase “state” in that context meant all governments.

Although the imposition of state taxes to help church buildings ended in the course of the 19th century, it wasn’t till 1947 that the Supreme Courtroom dominated with readability that the First Modification – the language of which solely restrains Congress – applies to the states as nicely.

We all know that it does as a result of the 14th Modification prohibits all states from abridging the privileges or immunities of residents of the USA. The phrase “privileges or immunities” connotes attributes of nationwide citizenship – first amongst that are a prohibition on government establishing a faith or interfering with its free train.

Said otherwise, the right to worship or not, and the right not to be charged for another person’s worship, are private human rights – as Jefferson known as them, inalienable rights.

Now, again to the governors and the bishops.

The governors permitted crowds at Walmart and arrested people for attending funerals. They permitted 1000’s of demonstrators in public streets and arrested not one in every of them for marching with out masks or not socially distancing.

My buddy Professor John Rao of St. John’s College wrote: “Our troubled world continues along its current revolutionary path with no clear idea as of yet just how far the diabolical disorientation that has been unleashed may go. One thing and one thing alone seems definite to me in the midst of the general uncertainty. With a few very notable exceptions, the leadership of our beloved Church, legitimate though that leadership is, has proven itself to be utterly subservient” to the state.

It was not the governors who shut the church buildings. It was – with some brave exceptions – the gutless American Catholic bishops who did so. By no means earlier than within the historical past of America has the Church turn out to be an arm of the state. The governors advised the bishops to shut their church buildings, and so they complied. Their predecessors have been martyrs. They’re cowards.


That’s not rendering to Caesar what’s Caesar’s. That’s rendering to Caesar what’s God’s.

Devoted Catholics consider that we devour the Bread of Life at Mass. The bishops don’t have any extra ethical right to deny us that salvific sacrament than do the governors.

Devoted Catholics additionally consider that Holy Mom Church is the route to everlasting salvation and the Bread of Life is the meals for that route. What mom would deny her kids meals? One within the fingers of state-subservient bishops.

When the Supreme Courtroom defined the 2 faith clauses, it dominated that they prohibit each conspicuous governmental help to faith and all government interference with it, and all extreme entanglement between church and state.


In one other time and place, how completely different this may need been. 100 years in the past, the Church was outlawed in Mexico and militias hunted down clergymen. Saying a public Mass then was the purposeful equal of a capital offense. But, there have been extra Lots celebrated for the trustworthy per day in Mexico in these years than in America within the final 88 days.

The wall of separation insulates our religious beliefs and practices from governmental tyranny. However with out episcopal constancy and braveness, the wall crumbles.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here